November 6, 2003
Flying
500 West Putnam Ave.
Greenwich, CT 06830
Dear Editor,
I have just finished reading J. Mac
McClellan�s article in the November issue of Flying called "What to do about
FSS." It is unfortunate that such a widely read and respected magazine as
yours continues to perpetuate many of the misunderstandings about today�s
AFSS system.
My name is Bill Moriarty. A 20 year Flight
Service Station employee, I have spent the last 12 years as an Operations
Supervisor at the Bangor AFSS. Since December 2002, I have been assigned to
the FAA A-76 study developing the Performance Work Statement (PWS) that is
an essential part of A-76 study. The PWS will form the basis of work that
will be expected from the contract winner. As part of this project my team
has been traveling to the 58 AFSS's in the lower 48 states that are included
in this study. During our travel�s we have cataloged over 2,000 separate and
distinct safety and national security functions that are conducted in
today�s AFSS system.
Those who believe that all an AFSS does is provide weather briefings, file
flight plans, and conduct search and rescue activities are severely
mistaken. Those who divide the FSS operating budget by the number of phone
calls received in an attempt to estimate the cost per service has absolutely
no clue what goes on in a Flight Service Station. Of the 2,000 separate AFSS
functions identified by the PWS team, fully 80 to 85% of those tasks are not
tracked or counted by any method whatsoever. In other words, pilot weather
briefings, flight plans and such, represent only about 15% of the tasks
conducted by the AFSS specialist. The rest is conducted "behind-the-scenes."
The "stuff" we do is in support of the rest of the NAS, only you will never
hear about it. No way a briefing costs the taxpayer $27 a piece.
You will never hear about how a few years ago on a Friday evening before the
Fourth of July weekend, I spent several hours on the telephone trying to
locate a Flight Standards person in Oklahoma City, OK. It seems that they
left for the weekend. Only problem was that they were the only ones
authorized to cancel the FDC NOTAM which was restricting the instrument
approach at Bar Harbor, Maine. The airport was fogged in, probably would be
for the weekend. Late in the afternoon the construction that caused the
increased minimums wrapped up, and there was no longer a need for the
restriction. It was, as I said a holiday weekend, probably the busiest
weekend of the airport�s year, only nobody could get in. My effort in
tracking down the Flight Standards person at home got that airport opened.
Fuel was sold, lobsters were eaten, and people were happy.
You will never hear about how George Gilligan, a specialist on my crew
received a message from the Turkish authorities about a KR-135 tanker
already over the Atlantic enroute to Turkey. Seems when the Air Force filed
the tankers flight plan they left off some significant information that was
going to lead the Turkish officials to deny landing rights to the crew. Only
the crew was out of range and had no idea of the events unfolding at their
destination. George was able to locate the proper diplomatic clearance
information and forward that to Turkey. Crew landed all right, but nobody,
even the United States Air Force, knows what occurred behind the scenes to
make that happen.
You will never hear about how Darryl Ayers, another specialist on my crew,
was able to ascertain that a particular aircraft was just stolen from an
airport in Maine. You will not hear about how the VFR-only aircraft took off
on an IFR day and disappeared in to the clouds. You won't know that Darryl's
quick thinking had the approach controller look to find the primary target,
tag it up, and then follow it, as the
driver, (he was not even a rated pilot), trying to avoid some legal problems
in the States, headed for Canada. Because of Darryl�s actions, the cops
found him and threw him in jail. But you won't hear about that, even
Northeast Air Defense Command lost this one in the hills.
You will never hear how Joni Colt saved 8 lives one rainy night in central
Massachusetts. You'll never hear how, working with a police department on
one phone, and an AT&T operator on the other, she thought to have the
emergency vehicles alternate the activation of their sirens as they drove
back and forth until the survivors, on a cell phone in their crashed
aircraft, were able to hear one of the rescue vehicles.
How about how the float plane operators, stranded outside the US following
9/11, were helped to return home by landing on the Canadian side of the
lake, taxiing across the border, then resuming their flight home. (There
were no restrictions on boats crossing the border.)
Or the student pilot I tracked down, that was unaware that they had left
their nose-wheel on the runway at Lebanon, NH. The pilot, upon learning
this, wisely opted to land not at Northampton, MA their intended
destination, but at Barnes-Westfield, MA where there is a controlled field
with CFR available. Funny thing here was the BAF controller got an award for
this one. Nobody thought about FSS, and how the pilot was tracked down and
notified of her impending doom.
Or how John MacLeod, another Bangor AFSS specialist, saved a pilot from a
$5,000 dollar US Customs fine when he tracked down and diverted the
VFR-not-talking-to-anybody-pilot traveling from Montreal to Lebanon, NH to a
more appropriate Customs clearing point in Burlington, VT.
These stories go on and on. This stuff occurs each day, in every AFSS across
the country. Any FSS person could entertain for hours with stories of lives
saved, mishaps averted, bad weather data corrected. Not everyone can afford
several hundred thousand dollars worth of weather avionics. Of those that
can, fewer still understand what they are looking at.
Mr. MacClellan seems to lament a loss of local knowledge when the first
round of FSS consolidation took place. Why then, would he think a "single
big FSS with phone lines to the entire country would be more efficient...?"
What would a briefer in McMinnville, Oregon know about the unforecast fog
situation in Machias, ME? What do I know about mountain passes in Colorado?
Why would a call center in India be more efficient? Be careful what you ask
for Mr. MacClellan, you might just get it.
I hope the FAA/Mitre
study actually is released. I have seen the early results. I have
seen that 93.5% of Airline Transport Pilots responded that they get weather
information from Flight Service Stations. I will be surprised if the data is
actually released. I will be surprised if the FAA wants it advertised that
we do more than "make coffee and brief general aviation pilots." (The FAA�s
words, not mine.)
You see, there is far, far more to a Flight Service Station than the
stereotypes perpetuated by the FAA and the rest of the uninformed. It is
saddening to me to have our profession so widely misunderstood. It is
appalling to me that the FAA appears to be on the verge of ignoring its own
study that shows the real value of Flight Service to aviation. Change is
necessary, no one disputes that. Modernization is necessary, no one disputes
that either. But sell out to a private contractor, to lose control of where
your facilities are located, to lose control of a responsive workforce, to
dismantle portions of the nations safety and security infra-structure, that
is dangerous and most unwise.
Fix the problems? Yes. Abdicate the responsibility and sell the capability?
No. Pilot weather briefings that cost $27 a piece? Get a grip.
Sincerely,
William J. Moriarty |