Published: September 23, 2002 -
Federal Times
FAA�s Risky Idea: Flight Service Jobs Must Not Be Privatized
By WALLY PIKE
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has acknowledged
that the remarkable air traffic control efforts in the aftermath of the
Sept. 11 attacks could not have taken place without the flight service
station (FSS) controllers. Already critically short-staffed, the FSS
employees absorbed a fourfold or greater increase in workload and were
instrumental in accomplishing the mission during the trying days that
followed.
The FAA air traffic controllers working in control towers
and radar rooms swung into action to safely land thousands of aircraft
nationwide in the space of a few hours, effectively deterring further
attacks. That is not the whole story.
The other part of the story begins with the air traffic
controllers who work in 61 automated flight service stations.
Fight service controllers were responsible for
dissemination of the shutdown order to air traffic facilities, airports and
pilots in flight within their individual areas of responsibility. They also
issued notices to the aviation community regarding airport restrictions and
outages of electronic aids to navigation as the shutdown progressed.
After the initial shock of the tragedy wore off, passengers and pilots from
grounded aircraft began asking the inevitable question, �When and how are we
going to get home?� Record numbers of pilots nationwide began dialing into
the flight service stations they relied upon for weather and flight-planning
information to find out what was happening.
Initially, information was scarce. Everyone was waiting for word from FAA
headquarters in Washington, D.C., on when flights and air traffic services
would resume. As data became available, the flight service controllers began
to explain how the multiple, complex and sometimes convoluted restrictions
would affect each pilot who called, depending on the classification of the
aircraft in question. Through it all, flight service controllers pitched in
to serve the flying public. Some from stations in Islip, N.Y., and Leesburg,
Va. � facilities near the sites of the attacks � even came in on their days
off to lend a hand during the crisis.
Incredibly, the reward for these employees was an FAA announcement on June
18 that it was conducting a study on the feasibility of privatizing FSS
operations. The FAA has determined that 80 percent of the FSS duties are
subject to further study for outsourcing. Among these duties are preflight
pilot-briefing services, in-flight aircraft services and search-and-rescue
services. The only duty determined inherently governmental is providing
notices to pilots.
Fairness aside, the FAA actions are ill-considered and ill-advised for
safety and security reasons. Do we really want the lowest bidder providing
in-flight and preflight services to pilots? Coordinating search and rescue
for lost and overdue pilots? Monitoring navigational aides? What about the
liability for these services if a private contractor provides them? The FAA
feasibility study shows potential homeland security issues in these and
other areas � but nevertheless, the FAA decided to continue down the
slippery slope of privatization.
The FAA has advised the National Association of Air Traffic Specialists that
this decision was made by the agency and not because of pressure from the
Office of Management and Budget. The last estimate is that this outsourcing
study � being done under OMB Circular A-76 � could last two to three years
and cost the FAA $9 million or more. This is, at best, an extremely
shortsighted use of scarce resources.
It is hard to believe that FSS is the ultimate target of this privatization
effort. If the FAA is successful with FSS privatization, then that provides
the blueprint for contracting out all the rest of air traffic control. It is
no secret that FSS is the sacrificial lamb when the agency has bigger plans
because, by comparison with the larger FAA unions, we have less clout and
influence.
Appeals to the FAA have fallen on deaf ears. Naturally we have talked with
members of Congress on both sides of the aisle and we have been assured
there will be no privatization of air traffic control. The A-76 process,
however, continues unabated.
Some functions should be inherently governmental. We feel that all of air
traffic control meets that definition. Our hope is to convince new FAA
Administrator Marion Blakey of this and to stop the folly of her
predecessor.
Wally Pike is president of the National Association of Air
Traffic Specialists, based in Wheaton, Md. The association is the exclusive
representative for the air traffic controllers in the flight service station
option of the Federal Aviation Administration. |